Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSaugy, J. J.
dc.contributor.authorSchmitt, L.
dc.contributor.authorFallet, S.
dc.contributor.authorFaiss, R.
dc.contributor.authorVesin, J. M.
dc.contributor.authorBertschi, M.
dc.contributor.authoret al.
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-09T12:57:07Z
dc.date.available2021-12-09T12:57:07Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationHigh Alt Med Biol. 2016 Sep;17(3):233-238
dc.identifier.urihttps://yoda.csem.ch/handle/20.500.12839/61
dc.description.abstractThe present study aimed to compare sleep disordered breathing during live high-train low (LHTL) altitude camp using normobaric hypoxia (NH) and hypobaric hypoxia (HH). Sixteen highly trained triathletes completed two 18-day LHTL camps in a crossover designed study. They trained at 1100-1200 m while they slept either in NH at a simulated altitude of 2250 m or in HH. Breathing frequency and oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) were recorded continuously during all nights and oxygen desaturation index (ODI 3%) calculated. Breathing frequency was lower for NH than HH during the camps (14.6 and/- 3.1 breath x min(-1) vs. 17.2 and/- 3.4 breath x min(-1), p < 0.001). SpO(2) was lower for HH than NH (90.8 and/- 0.3 vs. 91.9 and/- 0.2, p < 0.001) and ODI 3% was higher for HH than NH (15.1 and/- 3.5 vs. 9.9 and/- 1.6, p < 0.001). Sleep in moderate HH is more altered than in NH during a LHTL camp.
dc.subjectexercise; hypobaric hypoxia; normobaric hypoxia; sleep quality
dc.titleSleep Disordered Breathing During Live High-Train Low in Normobaric Versus Hypobaric Hypoxia
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.type.csemdivisionsDiv-E
dc.type.csemresearchareasDigital Health
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1089/ham.2016.0049


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Research Publications
    The “Research Publications” collection provides bibliographic information for scientific papers including conference proceedings and presentations.

Show simple item record