| dc.contributor.author | Oakton, E. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tillier, J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Siddiqi, G. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mickovic, Z. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sereda, O. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Fedorov, A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | et al. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-09T13:14:56Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-12-09T13:14:56Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | New Journal of Chemistry, vol. 40 (3), pp. 2655-2660, 2016. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://yoda.csem.ch/handle/20.500.12839/84 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Sb- and Nb-doped tin oxides have been prepared by a co-precipitation method. Whilst X-ray powder diffraction and EDX mapping indicate similar dopant distributions, more detailed characterisation by variable high-temperature XRD, Sn-119 MAS NMR and Nb K-edge X-ray absorption near edge structure spectroscopy reveal clear differences in the oxide structures. This detailed structural information is used to validate the measured differences in electrical conductivity. | |
| dc.subject | electrolyte fuel-cells, sno2 thin-films, lithium-ion batteries, x-ray-diffraction, optical-properties, gas sensors, carbon-free, sol-gel, nanoparticles, co, Chemistry | |
| dc.title | Structural differences between Sb- and Nb-doped tin oxides and consequences for electrical conductivity | |
| dc.type | Journal Article | |
| dc.type.csemdivisions | Div-T | |
| dc.type.csemresearchareas | Other | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1039/c5nj03182f | |
